si building manager mana tahu baca, try email to mazli@raineandhorne.com.my and cc to rhizpkl@streamyx.com

si building manager tak tau baca email dekat dia pun tak guna.... si saravanan lagi teruk, dia kata khabar dia tak ada baik, semua orang marah dia, tapi semua bukan kerja dia and maintenance fees yang kita bayar pun bukan masuk pocket raine horne....tapi terus ke BJD... moral of the story, saravanan ni hanya dibayar untuk duduk dekat JDA dan dia ni memang tak guna and tak mau ki complain dekat dia

where is the \"co-operative development ministry \" so that we can lodge a complaint ?

what co-operative development ministry??

its in the article u pasted Dan....

ops, missed that... Committees........what say u guys?

“After much hue and cry, the RA was finally given the green light by the Lembaga Penilai, Pentaksir Dan Ejen Harta Tanah Malaysia to temporarily manage the condominiums as owners of the units, provided they appoint a registered valuer to professionally manage Bukit OUG Condominiums.” Don’t quite understand the above para. What was the action taken that resulted in the above decision? Legal proceeding against Developer? Was there an order granted? Why Lembaga Penilai, Pentaksir Dan Ejen Harta Tanah Malaysia? Very interesting, this is a real classic example by Bukit OUG Height in the fight of “David against the Goliath”. For JDA, enough said, sufficient proofs. When you are talking to a dumb, you know how difficult it is to get the things done, and then you realize the only way out is to do it “gang-ho” way. Will a signing petition help? as a source of evidence of residents support, for any action against management.

Dan, Just curious, are you taking an action against the management and/or developer for: (i) the burglaries cases and claims as basis for the necessary application to court, OR, (ii) their slack in carrying out their role as management for JDA ( which include the security issue and non-disclosure of management accounts etc etc etc ) and therefore a basis ( hopefully) to remove them, just like Bukit OUG Height? For Bukit OUG Height, not sure their CF has been issued as of date. In view the developer has been wound-up and the liquidators are under no obligation to apply strata title for the project (subject to availability of funds into their hand), more reason the residents of Bukit OUG Height should stand up and take over the role, perhaps also self- funding the title application later on. And for this, I believe their RA has done a good job. We hope to see this in our RA too, and there is no harm to try to find out how from the RA of Bukit OUG Height the details of how they initiated the actions, after all, we all faced the same problems. Seriously, I do not know what is the position maintain by our RA with regard to the issues at hand. But if legal action against the developer/management is the only way out, I believe all residents will support the RA, not only morally, but actual field work. I personally respect our RA and wish to work hand-in hand with them. I do not think as residents, we are here to remove the management. They may keep that role as their golden egg, but provided they have also done their part in properly manage JDA, particularly, transparency of the management accounts.

tak tau samada u org perasan atau tidak...... tapi lepas operasi mengutip wang pengurusan di jda yang lepas, baru kerja kerja di jalil grove/sutera mula bergerak semula :wink:

Hi. This is extracted from The Star On-line today. Thursday December 7, 2006 Many high-rise residents face maintenance woes RESIDENTS of high-rise apartments have complained to the Federation of Malaysia Consumers Association (Fomca) about the high service charges and poor standard of service provided by management companies. They claimed that some of the housing maintenance companies were not concerned about the welfare of residents, reported Makkal Osai. Fomca president N. Marimuthu, in confirming that Fomca received many complaints, welcomed the recent announcement by Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak of the appointment of a building commissioner in every state to look into the problems faced by high-rise residents. He said there were many disputes arising in the maintenance, from the time of completion of building the apartments until the issuance of strata titles, which should be solved by the building commissioner. Residents who were not happy with their maintenance companies for charging high service charges and failing to provide efficient service should refer the problems to the building commissioner. Marimuthu hoped that the building commissioner would solve all the problems faced by the high-rise residents and ensure that maintenance companies complete repairs and other outstanding issues as soon as possible.

dah bertahun tahun bjd punya akaun pada tahap merah. si ho hup pulak kena bagi duit......... tapi bukan mcm dia org banyak duit pun :lol: tapi ada jugak baik kita punya apartmen dah siap....... bukan macam tu jalil sutera. terbengkalai je. siapa mau beli rumah bjd lagi??????

i m sure ho hup made a lot of money building JDA....tapi duit dah masuk kat pocket siapa, tak tahu la...